An organization with many stakeholders
When an organization speaks to leadership, working teams and outside partners at once, its website works well if each audience has its own path.
- Stakeholder alignment
- Multi-stakeholder
- High
A consulting firm's website works when every visitor first finds a short explanation of what the firm does, then the details. This case study shows how: less content, paths by role, and text that explains.
| Industry | B2B professional services |
|---|---|
| Challenge | Stakeholder alignment |
| Decision environment | Multi-stakeholder |
| Complexity | Intermediate |
| Service | Business website |
A B2B consulting firm has a website with a lot of text that visitors do not have time to read. This case study shows how the website is set up for the person who decides whether to work with the firm. First, they understand what the firm does. Then they judge whether it fits them. Finally, they make contact with confidence.
A mid-sized consulting firm sells services that nobody can see or try before buying: advice, analyses, programs that last months. The client cannot look at the result in advance, so the decision rests on what they read and on whom they trust. Nobody buys after a single visit. Before the first email is sent, many people look at the website, many times.
Every visitor looks for something different. An executive wants to see in one minute whether the firm understands her problem. A department head wants to know how the work is done in practice. The procurement team compares offers. It wants to find the basics quickly on every site: services, pricing, timelines and certifications.
So the website serves as reference material for an internal conversation, which usually happens without the firm in the room. Our process starts from this question: who will use the page, and what do they need to decide?
The website has a lot of text and little structure. The pages say the same things in different words. The services are described at length, yet a visitor can read three pages without understanding what exactly the firm does or how one service differs from another.
Those who decide have to do the sorting themselves: read a lot, find what concerns their sector, write their own summary. Most people prefer a firm that says it clearly in two sentences.
This cost is easy to miss. A visitor who does not understand a page simply does not get in touch. Inside the firm, every page looks clear, because the people who wrote it already know what they do. That is why an outside view helps.
Four constraints shape the work. The audience is multiple, with different priorities. Credibility matters a lot, because the client is buying trust in the advice. Many firms in the market sound the same. The existing content has value, because it holds real experience that the partners consider their own.
Constraint | What it means for the structure |
|---|---|
Multiple audiences | Each role has its own entry point |
High demand for credibility | Simple explanation instead of slogans |
Similar position in the market | The difference is stated concretely |
The existing content stays | Reorganizing and cutting instead of a fresh start |
The last constraint counts most in practice. A reorganization that keeps the best material is faster than writing from scratch. It also wins the partners' support more easily, and it usually gives a better result.
Four elements make the difference. First, one message for each audience, instead of one general message for everyone. Second, a hierarchy in the information, so the important sentence stands out from the detail. Third, language that explains instead of advertising. Fourth, less content, but more focused.
Explaining convinces more than slogans. A phrase like "tailored, results-oriented solutions" could be written by any competitor. A sentence that says exactly what you do, for whom and how sets you apart at once. More content does not automatically bring more credibility: after a point it hides what matters.
A small example: a firm has nineteen services in an alphabetical menu. The visitor cannot tell which three are the core and which sixteen are variations of them. When the three core services appear first, the firm shows right away what it is strong at. You will find more examples in the case study collection.
We organize the website around the visitor's decisions, not around the firm's org chart. First we split the content by who reads it: a short level for executives, saying what the firm does and for whom, and a separate level with the details of the services.
Then the emphasis moves from advertising to explaining. Every service page answers the same questions in the same order: what it is, who it is for, how the work is done, what the client needs to provide. Finally, the evaluation paths become visible, so each visitor follows the one that fits their role.
Before any page is designed, we agree the structure in writing: a simple list of pages with what each one must answer. The look comes after. This is the order in which business websites are built.
Four decisions do most of the work. Secondary content is limited, so the main message stands out. Each role gets its own path. Services are grouped by the name of the problem they solve, not by the names of internal departments. The main pages explain first and promote after.
Decision | Reason |
|---|---|
Limit the secondary content | A clear message for the reader in a hurry |
Paths by role | The executive and procurement need different pages |
Services grouped by client problem | Follows how the buyer thinks |
Explain before promoting | Convinces in a market where everyone says the same |
Each decision asks something of the firm. Cuts mean that some favorite pages are merged or removed. Paths by role need more thinking at the start. The gain in clarity is worth the effort. We write down the reasoning behind each decision, so the firm can discuss it before the build starts.
The outcome is a website where the visitor quickly understands what the firm does, judges whether it fits their own case, and makes contact with confidence. The new structure makes reading easier and the firm's credibility more visible.
Inquiries, Google rankings and conversion rates also depend on the market, on the firm's offer, and on the people who answer the phone. That is why we do not promise numbers. What the structure offers is clarity: a good firm is presented as it deserves, with pages that are easy to read. See how the same thinking applies to other industries, or in the case study on organizations with many stakeholders.
No client is named. What matters here is the structure and the reason we choose it, and both apply to any consulting firm.
Not always. When two services are bought by the same person for the same problem, one page with clear sections often works better than two smaller ones. The test is whether the visitor can tell the services apart in one read.
Usually quite a lot. The material is reorganized, cut where it repeats itself, and rewritten where it advertises instead of explaining. This keeps the firm's experience, and the partners recognize their work in the new website, so they approve it more easily.
Ask someone from outside the firm to read the home page and tell you in two sentences what you do and for whom. If they struggle, the structure needs work. You can also send a project request and describe the situation to us.
Send a project request, or check your current website for free. We read every message ourselves.